lo2go

Brown, like my hair (on my head, that is . .. )

A-shirt over no-name unbelted jeans sagging below the legs of my white briefs Most nights, briefs would be missing, bare buns on chair cushion; maybe shirtless, too, if it stays warm enough.

Had a pair once, found the fly very inconvenient, dumped them early. I thought the design was an idea that never should have been had. Never gave looks a thought, but now that you ask, I can't get turned on by them. That doesn't mean I can't get turned on by a guy wearing them; I can overlook a lot of clothing defects in a hot guy. Just my 2 cents

US 10-1/2. You guys make me feel like I have tiny feet. i always thought they were big enough for me -- except when I stub a toe and think they must be entirely too BIG . . .

Elforte7 said it all very well. I bet a lot of us have been in that situation; I was in high school (still dream of him!) and again in college (the visions still are sharp in my mind!). If you can(!) set your mind just to be a casual friend with him, and a good one, there may come opportunities to do more things with him, although not sexual. (There's nothing wrong with having a straight friend or two -- or more, especially if you aren't fully out.) If this is real, your friendship can become mutual and far exceed your lust for him. I know, first hand. Stay steady, and enjoy him in ways that you can. And, as said before, good luck (and lots of it!).

Great story! It's so realistic that I can see myself there, and get excited. But I want more! How about a sequel? I'm waiting, eagerly . . .

Good analogy. I sag because it feels good and sexy and stimulating; I look at saggers because they excite me -- by what I see and what I imagine from the way they sag. Sagging is hot, and most saggers are, too. I just wish more of them would show more; that would make it even more exciting -- for me.

Well sagging jeans (sitting on waistband below my butt) without a belt, over unlined red nylon running shorts (with a dark spot where I've been leaking precum looking through the galleries), sweatshirt, wool socks (house is chilly) and moccasins.

I like smooth skin - everywhere, including on the face. Longish sideburns are OK, anything else, to me, is a distraction from the overall desirability of the body. Of course, as has already been said, the person matters 1000% more than the hair, or anything else about his appearance. If he sags, especially so you can see it, that counts hugely in his favor. Now, a clean-shaven, smooth-skinned sagger showing it is about as good as it gets (providing he's got personality to go with it).

This keeps getting better, so realistic -- and probably the story of a lot of guys.

Can't wait for the next chapter, and the one after that, and . . .

For guys with smooth skin, a tattoo is, to me, a disfigurement. I like to see as much skin on a guy as I can; and I like to see -- and run my hands all over -- smooth skin. I still will talk to guys with tattoos, but won't spend much time taking their pictures (I love photography, especially of the male body!).